Nicolas-Louis de Lacaille
Born: 15 March 1713 in Rumigny-en-Thiérache, France
Died: 21 March 1762 in Paris, France
Click the picture above
to see three larger pictures
to see three larger pictures
|Main Index||Biographies index|
Nicolas-Louis de Lacaille or de la Caille was the son of Charles-Louis de Lacaille (1679-1731) and Barbe Rebuy. Most biographers agree on his birthday being 15 March 1713, though some sources mark his birthday on 14 December, closer to 29 December, the date of his baptism. Lacaille had three older brothers, five older sisters (one named Marie-Barbe) and one younger sister. All died at a young age except three girls, who became nuns, and Lacaille, the subject of this biography. The family had been living in Rumigny, in the Ardennes, for at least two generations. They owned the castle of Cour-des-Prés, where Lacaille grew up.
Charles-Louis was an educated man who had retired from the military to pursue his mechanical and scientific interests. He was particularly interested in mechanics and had invented several machines. Being in charge of Lacaille's studies from a young age, he transmitted his passions to him. Although the family were well off at first, Charles-Louis ran up debts when he embarked on a project to run a paper mill, which failed. Sent to Nantes by the Duke of Bourbon in 1725 to head a colonial project, his luck again ran out for the project was abandoned. He was next appointed by the Duchess of Vendôme as a guardian and huntsman at Anet, west of Paris.
Nicolas-Louis Lacaille went to study at the Collège de Mantes-sur-Seine (now Mantes-la-Jolie), 48 km west of Paris, and then, in 1729, with a scholarship to the Parisian Collège de Lisieux. At this College he studied rhetoric and philosophy for two years. These years were difficult since his health was so poor that he struggled to eat enough to stay alive. When he was eighteen, his father died, and Lacaille inherited a large amount of debt from him (he willingly took it upon himself while his sisters managed their father's assets). Lacaille managed to continue his education thanks to the financial help of Duque Louis Henri de Bourbon, who had been a friend of his father's. He went on to study theology at the Collège de Navarre, entering in 1732, intending at this stage to become a priest. His father had wanted him to enter the Church and he greatly respected the memory of his father's wishes.
During this time, Lacaille came across a copy of Euclid's Elements. His education until that point had mainly been literary, but he managed to teach himself geometry without the help of a teacher. He gained an interest in mathematics and started studying astronomy on his own. For three years, he balanced these new scientific interests with his theological studies. He eventually decided to focus entirely on the former, but he did not forget his religious background. He had become a deacon, and acted as such first in Saint-Étienne-du-Mont and later in the chapel of Collège Mazarin.
Through astronomy, Abbé Lacaille became friends with Jacques Cassini, then director of the Paris Observatory. Cassini's influence helped Lacaille improve in his astronomical observations. He also befriended Cassini's son, César-François (often called Cassini de Thury), and nephew, Jean-Dominique Maraldi. In 1735, Lacaille surveyed the French coast from Nantes to Bayonne, along with Maraldi. Lacaille started working in the Paris Observatory in May 1736, and stayed there until January 1740. In July 1739, along with Maraldi and Cassini de Thury, Lacaille began measuring the French meridian. Their objective was to revise earlier measures by Dominique Cassini (1690) and Jean Picard (1669-70). The survey took around three years and was often carried out in treacherous conditions in dangerous parts of the country. The results were published in 1743 with the title La Méridienne de France vérifiée Ⓣ under Cassini de Thury's name. Lacaille, however, had made all the calculations and was not happy that all he received was an acknowledgement of his help in the Preface. He wrote to James Bradley, sending a copy of another of his books:-
... I have also had printed the details of all the geometrical and astronomical operations that I have made with Cassini de Thury, to amend the work of his father on the figure of the earth. I would have sent it at the same time if I had not been so shocked by the behaviour of M Cassini, who has taken complete possession of this book, to which he has hardly done more than put his name and pay the costs of printing: if it had been on sale I would have bought a copy for you and one for me; but this book is not yet published so far as I know. What I am telling you here is not to complain about M Cassini but only to inform you about the author and the work. When you have seen it you can assure yourself of what I have the honour to tell you and can inform yourself of it through those of our Academy whom you know. However, you would please me by not revealing to anybody that I have told you about it myself. I ask a thousand excuses for the liberty that I have dared to take with you. But also I beg you to believe that there is nobody more inclined than myself to render all the services in this country that you judge me capable of...The measurements of the meridian confirmed Newton's idea that the Earth was a sphere flattened at the poles, as did the results from the expeditions sent to Peru and Lapland in 1735 and 1736. The Académie des Sciences recognised Lacaille's worth and elected him as an assistant astronomer on 3 May 1741, when he was only 28 years old. On 5 April 1745, he was elected associate astronomer, replacing Grandjean de Fouchy (who was appointed perpetual secretary). Ian Stewart Glass writes in :-
More than any other astronomer of his time, [Lacaille] saw the value to science of making accurate measurements of the stars and planets. A savant at the time of the 'enlightenment', which was then sweeping the intellectual world, he was one of the first French apostles of Newton, whose theory of gravitation had been looked upon with hostility and scepticism for almost fifty years. Descartes' erroneous theory of fluid vortices in a space filled with an ill-defined medium still held sway. But increasingly precise observations of the positions of the planets, moons and comets were making it clear that their movements could only be interpreted in Newtonian terms. Indeed, it can be said that Lacaille and the mathematicians who were his contemporaries in Paris were the true successors of Newton when it came to the development of celestial mechanics and physics as a whole.In 1739, he was appointed to the chair of mathematics at Collège Mazarin, in Paris, succeeding Pierre Varignon. There, he published many textbooks based on his lectures in mathematics (Leçons de Mathématiques Ⓣ, 1741), in mechanics (Leçons de Mécanique Ⓣ, 1743), in astronomy (Leçons d'Astronomie géométrique et physique Ⓣ, 1746) and in optics (Leçons d'Optique Ⓣ, 1750). It is a testament to their didactic importance that many of these works were republished several times and then translated into various languages. Abbé Lacaille would often sell these books to his students at half their prize, not interested in financial gain. Lacaille moved his observatory to Collège Mazarin, where a new one had been built for him, stopping his visits to the Paris Observatory by 1742.
In 1748 he received a copy of James Bradley's paper on his discovery of nutation. He replied to him in a letter dated 22 August 1748:-
It was the paper from you that I waited for with the most impatience since the rumour of this discovery spread, that is, since about ten years ago. I have been disgusted to see several of our astronomers quarrelling over the glory of supposedly themselves having made this discovery ...; but it and the rules obeyed by the movements should in fact have been ascribed to you ... Since I received your letter I have made a translation from which I read an extract to our academy, which is happy to have acquired you as one of its members.Indeed Bradley had been elected to the Academy of Sciences in July 1748. After receiving Bradley's paper, Lacaille adjusted all his own observations to allow for nutation. This, however, did not find favour with many of his French colleagues who were highly critical of him over this action. In fact he had little support from his French colleagues as Curtis Wilson points out in :-
In 1742 ... Lacaille proposed a project for improving the foundations of astronomy, revising solar theory, and forming a star catalogue, and he invited the other astronomers of the Academy to join him in this undertaking. Cold-shouldered by the Cassinis, treated with hostility by P C Le Monnier and Jean d'Alembert, he carried the project forward on his own, with a heroism that went beyond the mere courage of physical endurance. The journey to the Southern Hemisphere needs to be seen as in the service of this overarching aim.Indeed, one of Abbé Lacaille's greatest astronomical achievements was the cataloguing of the southern stars. On 20 November 1750 he embarked on the vessel Le Glorieux, commanded by d'Après de Mennevillette, a friend of Lacaille's. He headed to the Cape of Good Hope on a scientific expedition organised by the Académie des Sciences, set up at Lacaille's request. He arrived on 19 April 1751, after a detour to Rio de Janeiro. His observations, published in 1763 in Coelum Australe Stelliferum Ⓣ, include 10,305 distinct stars, immediately superseding Halley's previous catalogue, which was much smaller and less accurate. He identified fourteen new constellations, which he named after scientific instruments: Telescopium, Microscopium, Apparatus Sculptoris, Fornax chemical, Horologium, Reticulus rhomboidalis, Pyxis nautica, Antlia pneumatica, Octanis, Circinus, Norma, and Mons Menae. He described these constellations in Table des Ascensions Droites et des Declinaisons Apparentes des Etoiles australes renfermées dans le tropique du Capricorne ... Ⓣ (1756). Lacaille narrated in detail his journey to the Cape in Journal historique de voyage au Cap de Bonne-Espérance par feu M l'abbé de La Caille ... Ⓣ which was published posthumously in 1776. Abbé Carlier edited this publication and added a description of Lacaille's life. Two hundred years later, R Raven-Hart translated this work into English and it was published as Travels at the Cape, 1751-53: an annotated translation of 'Journal historique du voyage fait au Cap de Bonne-Espérance ...' (1976).
In 1751, while in the Cape, he made some observations of the Moon. Later, when put together with the observations carried out by Jérôme Lalande in Berlin at the same time, they allowed the astronomer to determine the lunar parallax. In 1752, he performed a measure of the arc of the meridian between Klipfontein and Cape Town. His results were slightly anomalous, suggesting that the earth was slightly pear-shaped. Ian Glass writes :-
Aided by slaves, he laid out a precise baseline of 12605 metres length employing measuring rods brought from Paris. This was used to calibrate the baseline of two large triangles with vertices at his observatory in Cape Town and near the present village of Aurora. The latitudes of the end stations were measured using a zenith sector. The radius of the earth at 33 degrees south was found to be comparable to that at 45 degrees north in France, implying that the planet was somewhat pear-shaped.Sir George Everest explained in 1821 that Lacaille was in error due to the gravitational attraction of the nearby mountains, particularly Table Mountain. Sir Thomas Mclear later revised this measure between 1838 and 1847 and was able to confirm that the error was not due to measurement errors by Lacaille for his baseline and latitudes were remarkably accurate.
Abbé Lacaille came back to Paris on 28 June 1754 and continued his research. He created a method to calculate the orbits of comets, he studied astronomical refraction and he published ephemerides and logarithmic tables, among other things. In 1757, he published Astronomiae Fundamenta Ⓣ, a catalogue of the 400 brightest stars that was far superior to any of its predecessors. It is of note that Lacaille did not sell the Astronomiae Fundamenta Ⓣ commercially, but distributed copies to those interested, paying for the expenses himself. In 1758, he published a set of solar tables that took planetary perturbations into account for the first time. In 1761, he observed Venus's passage in front of the Sun. Since the Observatory at Collège Mazarin was not ideal for it, Lacaille went to Carrières, near Charenton, along other astronomers. He was elected a member of the Science Academies of St Petersburg, Berlin, Stockholm, London, Göttingen and Bologna.
We mentioned above Lacaille correspondence with Bradley but he was certainly not the only astronomer with whom Lacaille corresponded. Between 1757 and 1761 he exchanged thirteen letters with Tobias Mayer :-
Four major topics are addressed : astronomical refraction, the return of Halley's comet in 1759, the determination of terrestrial longitudes by means of Lunar distances and Venus's passage across the Solar disc on the 6th of July 1761. The first topic dominants, turning out to be a particularly thorny issue. A disagreement concerning the corrections of refraction predicted by both astronomers leads them into a heated debate, in which each one defends stoutly his own observation instrument while casting suspicion on the instrument of the other. In this case Tobias Mayer was right; Lacaille never came to realise that the graduation of his sextant, although carefully verified, was defective.Lacaille continued working until his death at Collège Mazarin in 1762 due to a fatal attack of the gout certainly made worse due to over-work. He was 49 years old and had not published most of his observations. It was not until Francis Baily produced a catalogue that was published by the British Association in 1847 that all of Lacaille's observations became known. He is buried in the chapel of the Collège Mazarin.
Article by: I J Falconer, J G Mena, J J O'Connor, T S C Peres, E F Robertson, University of St Andrews.
List of References (21 books/articles)
Mathematicians born in the same country
Other Web sites
- Dictionary of Scientific Biography
- zbMATH entry