# Johann van Waveren Hudde

### Quick Info

Born
23 April 1628
Amsterdam, Netherlands
Died
15 April 1704
Amsterdam, Netherlands

Summary
Johann Hudde was a Dutch mathematician who worked on maxima and minima and the theory of equations. He gave an ingenious method to find multiple roots of an equation.

### Biography

Johann Hudde's father was Gerrit Hudde (1595-1647) who was a well-off merchant who served as an Amsterdam member on the governing body of the Dutch East India Company from 1632. Johann's mother was Maria Jonas de Witsen. From around 1648 Johann attended the University of Leiden where he studied law. However he was introduced to advanced mathematics at Leiden where he received private tuition from his teacher van Schooten.

Van Schooten had established a vigorous research school in Leiden which included Hudde, and this school was one of the main reasons for the rapid development of Cartesian geometry in the mid 17th century. Sluze, Huygens, van Schooten, Hudde and van Heuraet corresponded regarding the properties of curves, in particular Hudde was interested in techniques for determining tangents and finding maxima and minima. Most of the correspondence was directed through van Schooten in the sense that his students would tell him of their discoveries and he would inform the others as well as publish certain of their results as appendices to his own publications.

From 1654 until 1663 Hudde worked on mathematics as part of van Schooten geometry research group at Leiden. He went with van Heuraet to the Protestant university in Saumur, a town on the river Loire in western France, in 1658. From 1663 he worked in various roles for the Amsterdam City Council and as a juror, as Chancellor, and as deputy for the admiralty. Also, like his father, he was involved with the Dutch East India Company. He served for 30 years as burgomaster of Amsterdam being first appointed around 1670. There were four burgomasters but by law they could only serve for two out of every three years. This meant that Hudde was reappointed twenty-one times from his first appointment until his death. Politically he was considered as a moderate.

All of Hudde's mathematics was done before he began to work for the city council in 1663. Van Schooten edited and published a Latin translation of Descartes' La Géométrie in 1649. A second two-volume translation of the same work (1659-1661) contained appendices by de Witt, Hudde and van Heuraet.

Hudde worked on maxima and minima and the theory of equations. He gave an ingenious method to find multiple roots of an equation which is essentially the modern method of finding the highest common factor of a polynomial and its derivative. An example of Hudde's rule appeared first in van Schooten's Exercitatione mathematicae in 1657. In 1658 he wrote a letter entitled Epistola secunda, de maximis et minimis which was sent to van Schooten and published as an appendix to his 1659 edition of Descartes' La Géométrie. He gives his rule as follows [3]:-
If in an equation two roots are equal and if it be multiplied by any arithmetical progression, i.e. the first term by the first term of the progression, the second by the second term of the progression, and so on: I say that the equation found by the sum of these products shall have a root in common with the original equation.
This may seem mysterious so let us examine it further. Take the polynomial
$f (x) = a_{0}x^{0} + a_{1}x^{1} + a_{2}x^{2} + ...$

and the arbitrary arithmetic progression $p, p+k, p+2k, p+3k, ...$ and form a new polynomial
$f ^{*}(x) = pa_{0}x^{0} + (p+k)a_{1}x^{1} + (p+2k)a_{2}x^{2} + ...$

Then Hudde is claiming that if $a$ is a double root of $f (x) = 0$, then $a$ is a root of $f ^{*}(x) = 0$. Note that $f ^{*}(x) = pf (x) + kx f ' (x)$, and in the special case that $p = 0, k = 1$, then $f ^{*}(x) = x f ' (x)$, where $f ' (x)$ is the derivative. He uses this rule to find maxima and minima of polynomials and, even more impressively, quotients of polynomials.

Curtin writes [6]:-
In Jan Hudde's work on maxima there appear for the first time rules that are almost exactly those we use today, including a mechanical rule for handling polynomials that is almost "bring down the n and reduce by one" (the meaning of the derivative for many of our students). Even more interesting is his introduction of the quotient rule in handling rational expressions. ... Hudde had no notion of the derivative, but his approach to finding maxima of algebraic expressions is procedurally similar to ours - and yet curiously different ...
Hudde is able to use his rule to compute tangents to curves of the form $f (x, y) = 0$. He gives the following instructions [3]:-
Put all the terms on one side. Remove x, y from the divisors. Arrange in ascending powers of y and multiply each term by the corresponding term in any arithmetic progression whatsoever. Repeat this process for the terms containing x. Divide the first sum of products by the second. Multiply the quotient by -x and this will give the subtangent.
A fuller account of Hudde's rule was given in a letter he wrote dated 21 November 1659 which was not published at the time but, was published during the Newton-Leibniz controversy on who deserved priority for discovering the calculus, Hudde's letter was published as part of the evidence. This was entirely appropriate since Newton refers to Hudde's rule many times. Leibniz also studied Hudde's manuscripts and reported finding many excellent results. The manuscripts must have had an important influence on Leibniz's introduction of the calculus.

But Hudde made many more outstanding contributions. First let us mention that he was the first to treat the coefficients in algebra without considering whether they were positive or negative in De reductione aequationum. In 1656 he gave the power series expansion of $\ln(1+x)$. The following year he directed the flooding of parts of Holland to block the advance of the French army. He also worked on optics, publishing his short treatise Specilla circularia etc . in 1656. No copies of this seem to have survived but two manuscript versions have been found, one in London and the other in Hanover. Using the manuscripts, the work has recently been republished in [10]. E Knobloch writes:-
Hudde's treatise has to be read against the background of Descartes's theory of ovals and the dominance of paraxial optics. It is meant to be a complement to Descartes's work on the unison of rays after refraction, and that from a practical point of view, because Descartes's lenses could not be manufactured to a sufficient degree of accuracy. Hudde proposed a "mechanical" solution, which was not mathematically exact. Its originality lies in the exact way of dealing with inexactness.
He also produced microscopes and constructing telescope lenses. For many, however, Hudde is best known for his mathematical study of annuities [4]:-
Life annuities ... were a very common source of revenue for governments ... During the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries governments began to suspect that the prices they were setting on life annuities made them much more costly than alternative ways of borrowing money. ... In 1671 the city of Amsterdam was preparing to raise funds through the sale of a life annuity, and Johannes Hudde, a mathematician and city magistrate, investigated the appropriate price to set for the annuities. Using the theories of probability and demography being developed by his contemporaries Huygens and Graunt, Hudde gathered data from the records of a previous annuity issued in Amsterdam during the years 1586-90. Hudde's recommendations were used to establish the form of a life annuity issued by the city in 1672 and 1674. ... Hudde arranged the data that he had collected into a table headed by the age of the nominee at the time of purchase.
In fact we still have Hudde's table, for he included it in a letter he sent to Huygens on 18 August 1671. Hudde also corresponded with de Witt concerning annuities with letters between September 1670 and October 1671. In this correspondence he framed the law of mortality which today is attributed to De Moivre but properly should be attributed to Hudde. Although, on Hudde's recommendations, Amsterdam sold annuities at age dependent prices in 1672, there was no rapid move for others to adopt the practice.

Hudde also corresponded with Huygens on problems of canal maintenance and together they undertook a review of the lower Rhine and IJssel rivers so that they could produce a strategy to prevent the rivers from silting up. He also used his position to promote scholarly studies. He himself studied the philosophy of Spinoza and was able to arrange for Burchardus de Volder to be appointed to the University of Leiden in 1670. Burchardus de Volder was the first to teach natural philosophy in the Netherlands using experimental demonstrations during his lectures.

Greatly respected and a man of great influence, many dedicated their works to Hudde. For example Gerard Blasius's history of discoveries in anatomy.

### References (show)

1. K Haas, Biography in Dictionary of Scientific Biography (New York 1970-1990). See THIS LINK.
2. Biography in Encyclopaedia Britannica. http://www.britannica.com/biography/Johan-van-Waveren-Hudde
3. M E Baron, The Origins of the Infinitesimal Calculus (Dover, 2003).
4. G Alter, Plague and the Amsterdam Annuitant : A New Look at Life Annuities as a Source for Historical Demography, Population Studies 37 (1983), 23-41.
5. A K Charadze, On a modification of the method of Hudde and the formula of Cardano (Russian), Bull. Acad. Sci. Georgian SSR 4 (1943), 195-199.
6. D J Curtin, Jan Hudde and the quotient rule before Newton and Leibniz, College Math. 36 (4) (2005), 262-272.
7. A W Grootendorst, Johan Hudde's 'Epistola secunda de maximis et minimis'. Text, translation, commentary (Dutch), Nieuw Arch. Wisk. (4) 5 (3) (1987), 303-334.
8. K Haas, Die mathematischen Arbeiten von Johann Hudde, Centaurus 4 (1956), 235-284.
9. J MacLean, The literary remains of Johannes Hudde (Dutch), Sci. Hist. 13 (2-3) (1971), 144-162.
10. R Vermij and E Atzema, Specilla circularia : an unknown work by Johannes Hudde, Studia Leibnitiana 27 (1) (1995), 104-121.