Stanisław Leśniewski

Quick Info

30 March 1886
Serpukhov (near Ivanovo-Vosniesiensk), Russia
13 May 1939
Warsaw, Poland

Stanisław Lesniewski was a Russian-born mathemtician who was one of the founders of the Polish school of logic.


Stanisław Lesniewski's name should be written as Leśniewski but is usually transliterated as Lesniewski and we will use this form throughout this article. Lesniewski's father was Isydor Lesniewski, a Polish railway engineer. It was a job which involved Isydor Lesniewski being sent to places where railways were being constructed and at the stage when Stanisław was attending secondary school the family were living in Siberia. Stanisław attended school there in the town of Irkutsk.

He studied at several universities, spending some time in Munich where he attended lecturers by Hans Cornelius, before taking his doctorate at the Polish University of Lemberg (now Lviv, Ukraine but then under the control of Austria). In Lemberg he studied mainly philosophy and also took mathematics courses, attending mathematics lectures by Jozef Puzyna and Wacław Sierpiński. Lesniewski, whose doctoral supervisor was Kazimierz Twardowski, published the two papers A contribution to the analysis of existential propositions and An attempt at a proof of the ontological principle of contradiction while still undertaking his doctoral research. These papers were published in Lesniewski's mother tongue of Polish but in 1913 a Russian translation of the two papers was published under the single title Logical Studies. His doctorate was awarded in 1912.

At that time Jan Łukasiewicz was teaching at Lemberg, being promoted from Privatdozent to extraordinary professor in 1911, and he greatly influenced Lesniewski in the first course on mathematical logic which he gave there. One way in particular that this influence was exerted was over the law of the excluded middle. One of Lesniewski's first projects had been to attempt to disprove this principle, but Jan Łukasiewicz had published an appendix to his 1910 publication On the principle of contraction in Aristotle which caused Lesniewski to change to direction of his research. He began to study formal logic and began to make strenuous attempts to understand Russell's paradox which he had learnt through Jan Łukasiewicz.

In 1913 Lesniewski published an article on the law of the excluded middle, then in the following year a publication on Russell's paradox. He left Lwów to take up a teaching position at a Warsaw school but after the start of World War I he made the decision to return to Russia, He spent 1914-18 in Moscow where he taught at a Polish High School. Although he had presented his first ideas on a new theory of classes which would avoid the paradoxes while he was in Lwów, it was during his time in Moscow that Lesniewski published his formal theory called mereology. We give some further technical details of this theory below.

As soon as Poland was liberated at the end of the war, Lesniewski returned to Warsaw. There he began to get more involved in the study of mathematical logic. Janiszewski and Mazurkiewicz had created in Warsaw by the end of the war one of the strongest schools of mathematics in the world. Led by Janiszewski this school was particularly interested in set theory, and the foundations of mathematics. Lesniewski enthusiastically joined Janiszewski's school of mathematics. In 1919, he accepted the chair of the philosophy of mathematics at Warsaw where Łukasiewicz was already teaching.

Various mathematicians in Warsaw, including Janiszewski, Mazurkiewicz and Lesniewski, played a major role in the setting up of the journal Fundamenta Mathematicae. It was Janiszewski who proposed the name of the journal in 1919 but Lesniewski was a member of the editorial board influencing policy. The first volume appeared in 1920 and, although the intention was for a truly international journal, the editors had quite deliberately decided to make the first volume contain papers by Polish authors only. Janiszewski wrote:-
... it is my intention to present, if possible, all Polish mathematicians working in the field of set theory, to which the journal is devoted.
Łukasiewicz, who as we mentioned was also on the staff at Warsaw University at this time, began collaborating with Lesniewski. Łukasiewicz had considerable influence on Polish education over this period for he served as Polish Minister of Education in 1919 and was twice rector of Warsaw University. During this time Łukasiewicz and Lesniewski founded the Warsaw School of Logic. They gathered round them a group of impressive students. Tarski was a student of Lesniewski who helped make this school internationally famous as he progressed from student to colleague of Lesniewski and Łukasiewicz.

In 1927 Lesniewski published his first important work on the foundations of mathematics. From then until 1939 he published a series of twelve papers giving his theories of logic and mathematics. His theories overcame the paradoxes of Russell in set theory. The editors of [7] write in the Introduction to that work:-
For Lesniewski his publications were not the only way of publishing his new system of the foundations of mathematics. He attached great importance to his university lectures and he lectured almost entirely about his own work.
These lectures are given in [5]. Fortunately Tarski was able to make known the unpublished results of Lesniewski which were destroyed in World War II.

The author of [15] argues that the importance of Lesniewski's work is in providing an alternative to the classical approach to logic and the foundations of mathematics. Lesniewski's contributions to logic concentrate on the structure of a sentence, and he argues for the traditional idea of a sentence as consisting of a subject, an object and a copula. His mathematical work concentrates on set theory, where his concern is the nature of a set. Lesniewski puts the main emphasis on the distinction between sets in the distributive sense and sets in the collective sense.

Lesniewski's views developed from his analysis of Russell's paradox which he concluded confused two different notions of class. The three major logical systems which Lesniewski developed were: Protothetic, a theory of propositions and propositional functors, similar in power to a theory of propositional types, providing an extended propositional calculus with quantified functional variables; Ontology, which is an axiomatised theory of common names based on protothetic which may be characterised as a cross between traditional term logic and modern type theory, containing, besides singular terms, also empty and plural terms and a host of other interesting features; and Mereology, which is an axiomatic extension of ontology for a theory of classes quite different from set theory providing a formal theory of part and whole similar to the calculus of individuals.

Surma, Srzednicki, Barnett and Rickey as the editors of [7] sum up Lesniewski's contributions:-
Stanisław Lesniewski was one of the co-founders of the Polish School of Logic and an author of a new and wholly original system of the foundations of logic and mathematics. He was also the forerunner and originator of many ideas included as a matter of course in modern textbooks of logic and the foundations of mathematics. Although Lesniewski played a considerable role during the period of development of modern mathematical logic and of the foundations of mathematics, his systems are not as well known as they deserve to be and the fact remains that his systems are not generally accepted as a tool in the foundational practice. Nevertheless, they have greatly influenced the very philosophy of mathematics.

References (show)

  1. C Lejewski, Biography in Encyclopaedia Britannica.
  2. T Kotarbinski, Gnosiology: The Scientific Approach to the Theory of Knowledge (1966).
  3. E C Luschei, The Logical Systems of Lesniewski (1962).
  4. D Miéville and D Vernant (eds.), Stanislaw Lesniewski aujourd'hui, Grenoble, October 8-10, 1992 (Neuchâtel, 1996).
  5. J T J Srzednicki and Z Stachniak (eds.), Lesniewski's lecture notes in logic (Dordrecht, 1988).
  6. J T J Srzednicki and Z Stachniak (eds.), Lesniewski's systems protothetic (Dordrecht, 1998).
  7. S J Surma, J T Srzednicki, D I Barnett and V F Rickey (eds.), Stanislaw Lesniewski : Collected works (2 Vols.) (Dordrecht-Boston-New York, 1988).
  8. A Betti, De Veritate : another chapter : The Bolzano-Lesniewski connection, in The Lvov-Warsaw School and Contemporary Philosophy, 1995 (Dordrecht, 1998), 115-137.
  9. Bibliography of Stanislaw Lesniewski, in Stanislaw Lesniewski aujourd'hui, Grenoble, October 8-10, 1992 (Neuchâtel, 1996), 21-24.
  10. W L Gombocz, Lesniewski und Mally, Notre Dame J. Formal Logic 20 (4) (1979), 934-946.
  11. G Kalinowski, Les démonstrations de la non-existence des objets généraux chez Lesniewski, in Stanislaw Lesniewski aujourd'hui, Grenoble, October 8-10, 1992 (Neuchâtel, 1996), 121-145.
  12. A Lecomte, Une descendance des systèmes de Lesniewski : le calcul de Lambek (de la grammaire logique aux grammaires de logique des types) in Stanislaw Lesniewski aujourd'hui, Grenoble, October 8-10, 1992 (Neuchâtel, 1996), 207-235.
  13. C Lejewski, Remembering Stanislaw Lesniewski, in Stanislaw Lesniewski aujourd'hui, Grenoble, October 8-10, 1992 (Neuchâtel, 1996), 25-66.
  14. C Lejewski, Stanislaw Lesniewski (1886-1939) (Polish), Wiadom. Mat. 28 (2) (1990), 153-182.
  15. W Marciszewski, The place of Stanislaw Lesniewski in contemporary logic-philosophical thought (Polish), Wiadom. Mat. 28 (1) (1988), 65-68.
  16. D Miéville, Calcul et raisonnement chez Lesniewski, in Raisonnement et calcul, Neuchâtel, 1994 (Neuchâtel, 1995), 135-147.
  17. D Miéville, Stanislaw Lesniewski et l'importance d'une logique développementale, in Stanislaw Lesniewski aujourd'hui, Grenoble, October 8-10, 1992 (Neuchâtel, 1996), 67-92.
  18. D Miéville, Un aperçu des caractéristiques et de l'esprit des systèmes logiques de Stanislaw Lesniewski, in Colloquium on Stanislaw Lesniewski's Ontology, Neuenburg, 1984, Dialectica 39 (3) (1985), 165-179.
  19. R Poli and M Libardi, Lesniewski's conception of logic, in The Lvov-Warsaw School and Contemporary Philosophy 1995 (Dordrecht, 1998), 139-152.
  20. V F Rickey, A survey of Lesniewski's logic, in Lesniewski's systems protothetic (Dordrecht, 1998), 23-41.
  21. V F Rickey, A survey of Lesniewski's logic, in On Lesniewski's systems, Kraków, 1976, Studia Logica 36 (4) (1977/78), 407-426.
  22. P Simons, Discovering Lesniewski, Hist. Philos. Logic 15 (2) (1994), 227-235.
  23. P Simons, Lesniewski and ontological commitment, in Stanislaw Lesniewski aujourd'hui, Grenoble, October 8-10, 1992 (Neuchâtel, 1996), 103-119.
  24. P M Simons, On understanding Lesniewski, Hist. Philos. Logic 3 (2) (1982), 165-191.
  25. J Slupecki, Lesniewski's protothetics, in Lesniewski's systems protothetic (Dordrecht, 1998), 85-152.
  26. Z Stachniak, How Lesniewski proved the relative consistency of mereology, Zeszyty Nauk. Wy z. Szkola Ped. Powstancow Sl. Opolu Mat. 28 (1992), 97-103.
  27. S J Surma, On the work and influence of Stanislaw Lesniewski, in Logic Colloquium 76, Oxford, 1976 (Amsterdam, 1977), 191-220.
  28. J Trentman, Lesniewski's ontology and some medieval logicians, Notre Dame J. Formal Logic 7 (1966), 361-364.
  29. J Wolenski, Stanislaw Lesniewski (Polish), in Mathematics at the turn of the twentieth century, Jaworze, 1988 (Katowice, 1992), 39-44.
  30. J Wolenski, Lesniewski's logic and the concept of being, in Stanislaw Lesniewski aujourd'hui, Grenoble, October 8-10, 1992 (Neuchâtel, 1996), 93-101.

Additional Resources (show)

Other websites about Stanisław Leśniewski:

  1. Mathematical Genealogy Project
  2. MathSciNet Author profile
  3. zbMATH entry

Last Update September 2001