Al-Sabi Thabit ibn Qurra al-Harrani


Quick Info

Born
836
Harran, Mesopotamia (now Turkey)
Died
18 February 901
Baghdad, (now in Iraq)

Summary
Thabit ibn Qurra was an important Islamic mathematician who worked on number theory, astronomy and statics.

Biography

Thabit ibn Qurra was a native of Harran and a member of the Sabian sect. The Sabian religious sect were star worshippers from Harran often confused with the Mandaeans (as they are in [1]). Of course being worshipers of the stars meant that there was strong motivation for the study of astronomy and the sect produced many quality astronomers and mathematicians. The sect, with strong Greek connections, had in earlier times adopted Greek culture, and it was common for members to speak Greek although after the conquest of the Sabians by Islam, they became Arabic speakers. There was another language spoken in southeastern Turkey, namely Syriac, which was based on the East Aramaic dialect of Edessa. This language was Thabit ibn Qurra's native language, but he was fluent in both Greek and Arabic.

Some accounts say that Thabit was a money changer as a young man. This is quite possible but some historians do not agree. Certainly he inherited a large family fortune and must have come from a family of high standing in the community. Muhammad ibn Musa ibn Shakir, who visited Harran, was impressed at Thabit's knowledge of languages and, realising the young man's potential, persuaded him to go to Baghdad and take lessons in mathematics from him and his brothers (the Banu Musa).

In Baghdad Thabit received mathematical training and also training in medicine, which was common for scholars of that time. He returned to Harran but his liberal philosophies led to a religious court appearance when he had to recant his 'heresies'. To escape further persecution he left Harran and was appointed court astronomer in Baghdad. There Thabit's patron was the Caliph, al-Mu'tadid, one of the greatest of the 'Abbasid caliphs.

At this time there were many patrons who employed talented scientists to translate Greek text into Arabic and Thabit, with his great skills in languages as well as great mathematical skills, translated and revised many of the important Greek works. The two earliest translations of Euclid's Elements were made by al-Hajjaj. These are lost except for some fragments. There are, however, numerous manuscript versions of the third translation into Arabic which was made by Hunayn ibn Ishaq and revised by Thabit. Knowledge today of the complex story of the Arabic translations of Euclid's Elements indicates that all later Arabic versions develop from this revision by Thabit.

In fact many Greek texts survive today only because of this industry in bringing Greek learning to the Arab world. However we must not think that the mathematicians such as Thabit were mere preservers of Greek knowledge. Far from it, Thabit was a brilliant scholar who made many important mathematical discoveries.

Although Thabit contributed to a number of areas the most important of his work was in mathematics where he [1]:-
... played an important role in preparing the way for such important mathematical discoveries as the extension of the concept of number to (positive) real numbers, integral calculus, theorems in spherical trigonometry, analytic geometry, and non-euclidean geometry. In astronomy Thabit was one of the first reformers of the Ptolemaic system, and in mechanics he was a founder of statics.
We shall examine in more detail Thabit's work in these areas, in particular his work in number theory on amicable numbers. Suppose that, in modern notation, S(n)S(n) denotes the sum of the aliquot parts of nn, that is the sum of its proper quotients. Perfect numbers are those numbers nn with S(n)=nS(n) = n while mm and nn are amicable if S(n)=mS(n) = m, and S(m)=nS(m) = n. In Book on the determination of amicable numbers Thabit claims that Pythagoras began the study of perfect and amicable numbers. This claim, probably first made by Iamblichus in his biography of Pythagoras written in the third century AD where he gave the amicable numbers 220 and 284, is almost certainly false. However Thabit then states quite correctly that although Euclid and Nicomachus studied perfect numbers, and Euclid gave a rule for determining them ([6] or [7]):-
... neither of these authors either mentioned or showed interest in [amicable numbers].
Thabit continues ([6] or [7]):-
Since the matter of [amicable numbers] has occurred to my mind, and since I have derived a proof for them, I did not wish to write the rule without proving it perfectly because they have been neglected by [Euclid and Nicomachus]. I shall therefore prove it after introducing the necessary lemmas.
After giving nine lemmas Thabit states and proves his theorem: for n>1n > 1, let pn=3.2n1p_{n} = 3.2^{n} -1 and q_{n} = 9.2^{2}^{n-1} -1. If pn1,pnp_{n-1}, p_{n}, and qnq_{n} are prime numbers, then a=2npn1pna = 2^{n}p_{n-1}p_{n} and b=2nqnb = 2^{n}q_{n} are amicable numbers while aa is abundant and bb is deficient. Note that an abundant number nn satisfies S(n)>nS(n) > n, and a deficient number nn satisfies S(n)<nS(n) < n. More details are given in [9] where the authors conjecture how Thabit might have discovered the rule. In [13] Hogendijk shows that Thabit was probably the first to discover the pair of amicable numbers 17296, 18416.

Another important aspect of Thabit's work was his book on the composition of ratios. In this Thabit deals with arithmetical operations applied to ratios of geometrical quantities. The Greeks had dealt with geometric quantities but had not thought of them in the same way as numbers to which the usual rules of arithmetic could be applied. The authors of [22] and [23] stress that by introducing arithmetical operations on quantities previously regarded as geometric and non-numerical, Thabit started a trend which led eventually to the generalisation of the number concept.

Thabit generalised Pythagoras's theorem to an arbitrary triangle (as did Pappus). He also discussed parabolas, angle trisection and magic squares. Thabit's work on parabolas and paraboliods is of particular importance since it is one of the steps taken towards the discovery of the integral calculus. An important consideration here is whether Thabit was familiar with the methods of Archimedes. Most authors (see for example [29]) believe that although Thabit was familiar with Archimedes' results on the quadrature of the parabola, he did not have either of Archimedes' two treatises on the topic. In fact Thabit effectively computed the integral of x√x and [1]:-
The computation is based essentially on the application of upper and lower integral sums, and the proof is done by the method of exhaustion: there, for the first time, the segment of integration is divided into unequal parts.
Thabit also wrote on astronomy, writing Concerning the Motion of the Eighth Sphere. He believed (wrongly) that the motion of the equinoxes oscillates. He also published observations of the Sun. In fact eight complete treatises by Thabit on astronomy have survived and the article [20] describes these. The author of [20] writes:-
When we consider this body of work in the context of the beginnings of the scientific movement in ninth-century Baghdad, we see that Thabit played a very important role in the establishment of astronomy as an exact science (method, topics and program), which developed along three lines: the theorisation of the relation between observation and theory, the 'mathematisation' of astronomy, and the focus on the conflicting relationship between 'mathematical' astronomy and 'physical' astronomy.
An important work Kitab fi'l-qarastun (The book on the beam balance) by Thabit is on mechanics. It was translated into Latin by Gherard of Cremona and became a popular work on mechanics. In this work Thabit proves the principle of equilibrium of levers. He demonstrates that two equal loads, balancing a third, can be replaced by their sum placed at a point halfway between the two without destroying the equilibrium. After giving a generalisation Thabit then considers the case of equally distributed continuous loads and finds the conditions for the equilibrium of a heavy beam. Of course Archimedes considered a theory of centres of gravity, but in [14] the author argues that Thabit's work is not based on Archimedes' theory.

Finally we should comment on Thabit's work on philosophy and other topics. Thabit had a student Abu Musa Isa ibn Usayyid who was a Christian from Iraq. Ibn Usayyid asked various questions of his teacher Thabit and a manuscript exists of the answers given by Thabit, this manuscript being discussed in [21]. Thabit's concept of number follows that of Plato and he argues that numbers exist, whether someone knows them or not, and they are separate from numerable things. In other respects Thabit is critical of the ideas of Plato and Aristotle, particularly regarding motion. It would seem that here his ideas are based on an acceptance of using arguments concerning motion in his geometrical arguments.

Thabit also wrote on [1]:-
... logic, psychology, ethics, the classification of sciences, the grammar of the Syriac language, politics, the symbolism of Plato's Republic ... religion and the customs of the Sabians.
This archive contains information on other members of Thabit's family. His son, Sinan ibn Thabit, and his grandson Ibrahim ibn Sinan ibn Thabit, both were eminent scholars who contributed to the development of mathematics. Neither, however, reached the mathematical heights of Thabit.


References (show)

  1. Y Dold-Samplonius, A T Grigorian, B A Rosenfeld, Biography in Dictionary of Scientific Biography (New York 1970-1990). See THIS LINK.
  2. Biography in Encyclopaedia Britannica. http://www.britannica.com/biography/Thabit-ibn-Qurrah
  3. F J Carmody, The Astronomical Works of Thabit b. Qurra (Berkeley-Los Angeles, 1960).
  4. F J Carmody, Thabit b. Qurra, Four Astronomical Tracts in Latin (Berkeley, Calif., 1941).
  5. E A Moody and M Clagett (eds.), The medieval science of weights, Treatises ascribed to Euclid, Archimedes, Thabit ibn Qurra, Jordanus de Nemore, and Blasius of Parma (Madison, Wis., 1952).
  6. R Rashed, The development of Arabic mathematics : between arithmetic and algebra (London, 1994).
  7. R Rashed, Entre arithmétique et algèbre: Recherches sur l'histoire des mathématiques arabes (Paris, 1984).
  8. C B Boyer, Clairaut le Cadet and a theorem of Thabit ibn Qurra, Isis 55 (1964), 68-70.
  9. S Brentjes and J P Hogendijk, Notes on Thabit ibn Qurra and his rule for amicable numbers, Historia Math. 16 (4) (1989), 373-378.
  10. F J Carmody, Notes on the astronomical works of Thabit b. Qurra, Isis 46 (1955), 235-242.
  11. Y Dold-Samplonius, The 'Book of assumptions', by Thabit ibn Qurra (836-901), in History of mathematics (San Diego, CA, 1996), 207-222.
  12. H Hadifi, Thabit ibn Qurra's 'al-Mafrudat' (Arabic), Deuxième Colloque Maghrebin sur l'Histoire des Mathématiques Arabes (Tunis, 1990), A163-A164, 197-198.
  13. J P Hogendijk, Thabit ibn Qurra and the pair of amicable numbers 17296, 18416, Historia Math. 12 (3) (1985), 269-273.
  14. K Jaouiche, Le livre du qarastun de Tabit ibn Qurra. étude sur l'origine de la notion de travail et du calcul du moment statique d'une barre homogène, Arch. History Exact Sci. 13 (1974), 325-347.
  15. L M Karpova and B A Rosenfeld, The treatise of Thabit ibn Qurra on sections of a cylinder, and on its surface, Arch. Internat. Hist. Sci. 24 (94) (1974), 66-72.
  16. L M Karpova and B A Rozenfel'd, A treatise of Thabit ibn Qurra on composite ratios (Russian), in History Methodology Natur. Sci. V (Moscow, 1966), 126-130.
  17. G E Kurtik, The theory of accession and recession of Thabit ibn Qurra (Russian), Istor.-Astronom. Issled. 18 (1986), 111-150.
  18. G E Kurtik and B A Rozenfel'd, Astronomical manuscripts of Thabit ibn Qurra in the library of the USSR Academy of Sciences (Russian), Voprosy Istor. Estestvoznan. i Tekhn. (4) (1983), 79-80.
  19. K P Moesgaard, Thabit ibn Qurra between Ptolemy and Copernicus : an analysis of Thabit's solar theory, Arch. History Exact Sci. 12 (1974), 199-216.
  20. R Morelon, Tabit b. Qurra and Arab astronomy in the 9th century, Arabic Sci. Philos. 4 (1) (1994), 6; 111-139.
  21. S Pines, Thabit Qurra's conception of number and theory of the mathematical infinite, in 1968 Actes du Onzième Congrès International d'Histoire des Sciences Sect. III : Histoire des Sciences Exactes (Astronomie, Mathématiques, Physique) (Wrocław, 1963), 160-166.
  22. B A Rozenfel'd and L M Karpova, Remarks on the treatise of Thabit ibn Qurra (Russian), in Phys. Math. Sci. in the East 'Nauka' (Moscow, 1966), 40-41.
  23. B A Rozenfel'd and L M Karpova, A treatise of Thabit ibn Qurra on composite ratios (Russian), in Phys. Math. Sci. in the East 'Nauka' (Moscow, 1966), 5-8.
  24. A I Sabra, Thabit ibn Qurra on the infinite and other puzzles : edition and translation of his discussions with Ibn Usayyid, Z. Gesch. Arab.-Islam. Wiss. 11 (1997), 1-33
  25. A Sayili, Thabit ibn Qurra's generalization of the Pythagorean theorem, Isis 51 (1960), 35-37.
  26. J Sesiano, Un complément de Tabit ibn Qurra au 'Perì diairéseon' d'Euclide, Z. Gesch. Arab.-Islam. Wiss. 4 (1987/88), 149-159.
  27. K Taleb and R Bebouchi, Les infiniment grands de Thabit Ibn Qurra, in Histoire des mathématiques arabes (Algiers, 1988), 125-131.
  28. A P Yushkevich, Note sur les déterminations infinitésimales chez Thabit ibn Qurra, Arch. Internat. Histoire Sci. 17 (66) (1964), 37-45.
  29. A P Yushkevich, Quadrature of the parabola of ibn Qurra (Russian), in History Methodology Natur. Sci. V (Moscow, 1966), 118-125.

Additional Resources (show)


Honours (show)


Cross-references (show)


Written by J J O'Connor and E F Robertson
Last Update November 1999